Friday, May 13, 2011

Behar 5771: Westchester United!

BEHAR 5771

I live 8 miles from Westchester Reform Temple. On a good day, in no traffic, it takes me 12 minutes to drive to work. On a bad day, don’t ask. The little community in which I live goes by many names. Our mailing address says Bronxville but the nearest Metro-North station is Fleetwood. The School District is Yonkers but the nearest city is Mount Vernon. If I walk ¼ miles west of our condo, I’m on the campus of Sarah Lawrence College. If I walk ¼ mile east, I’m in an apartment complex in downtown Mount Vernon.

The intersection of these communities sets their disparities into high relief. Green-and-pink flowering trees line the college walkways adjacent to the concrete sprawl of the Cross-County Mall. The green-and-pink argyle uniform of the archetypal Bronxvillian clashes with the low-slung pants and baseball cap of the Mount Vernon adolescent. As but one of countless related statistics, in 2007 the average SAT score in Bronxville was 1217; in Mount Vernon it was 838 (outranking only some districts in Yonkers which averaged as low as 794). (Scarsdale averaged 1256 that year for those of you who seek bragging rights.)

Living where I do has made me aware of pervasive, corrosive challenges in Westchester County.

WRT has been, and will remain, responsive to local concerns, even as we always stand at the ready to respond to an emergent crisis. When it comes to doing God’s work on earth, we do not take an either/or approach. When we were asked, “Does WRT stand with Darfur or with Israel?” the answer was a resounding YES. Do we stand with Haiti or with Japan? YES. Do we stand with New Orleans or with New Rochelle? YES.

Engagement at the local level does not preclude engagement in global concerns. Our generation will be remembered either for our moral grandeur or for our failure to uphold the mitzvot of responsible stewardship of our world. We will confront the threats posed by our dependence on fossil fuels. Any responsible commitment to Tikkun Olam requires both a telescope and a microscope.

Addressing the needs of Westchester County constitutes a core commitment of my rabbinate. We have big problems here, like school violence and gangs; school systems that fail to prepare youth for college and a competitive global job market; drug addiction; deadbeat and incarcerated parents; meager options for low-income housing, inadequate daycare for children of single working mothers, poorly funded after-school programs for adolescents (where they exist at all), and insufficient access to affordable, nutritious food.

Some of these problems seem unprecedented, but many date back as far as human civilization. Above all, we see with unmistakeable clarity in Westchester County a problem both global and local, modern and ancient: the growing gap between the rich and the poor, a gap that allows communities like Scarsdale to flourish alongside Mount Vernon, Rye Brook alongside Port Chester.

This week’s Torah portion, Behar, tackles head-on the gap between the haves and the have-nots. It speaks of an institution called Yovel, the Jubilee or fiftieth year, requiring a remission of outstanding debts, a cancellation of outstanding mortgages, a return of estates to original owners, a release of indentured laborers, and mandated welfare for the destitute. This parasha also reinforces the longstanding Jewish practice of interest-free loans.

Could the authorities really have enforced such a sweeping economic recalibration without widespread revolt or protest? Is the Bible’s vision the very definition of utopian, that is to say, of a society that could never exist? Apparently even by Hillel’s time in the first century BCE, creditors would refuse loans to people in need when the Yovel was approaching. Nevertheless we must admire the Torah’s moral courage to call it like it is, to identify the widening gap between rich and poor as a failed social condition requiring remedy.

That moral courage later would also find its voice in Reform Judaism. Listen to these words from the Pittsburgh Platform of 1885, the capstone principle of a generation’s definitive statement of purpose:

In full accordance with the spirit of the Mosaic legislation, which strives to regulate the relations between rich and poor [that’s a reference to this week’s portion], we deem it our duty to participate in the great task of modern times, to solve, on the basis of justice and righteousness, the problems presented by the contrasts and evils of the present organization of society.

“The contrasts and evils of the present organization of society!” Good for us for speaking with blunt force -- back in 1885. Can we summon the courage to say it again now? If you want to see those “contrasts and evils” up close, just take a twelve minute drive in any direction.

Let me repeat: WRT has never neglected our neighborhood. I am inspired every day by our congregants’ dedication, creativity, and perseverance, from Cooking for a Cause, to monthly mitzvah collections, to seasonal and sustained food drives. When I came to WRT, I developed a program to oversee student mitzvah projects. Now virtually every Bar and Bat Mitzvah completes a commitment of 18 hours of community service, and many continue well into High School. Our congregants have created opportunities like Favors for Humanity, for families to pool money that would otherwise have been spent on party favors into a communal tzedakah fund, and Food Rescue, which hygienically conveys leftovers from catered events to local institutions with limited food budgets.

WRT understands the power of tzedakah. I’m reminded of the scene in Fiddler on the Roof when Lazar Wolf sees a man begging on the streets and says, “Here, Reb Nachum, is one kopek.” The beggar says, “One kopek? Last week you gave me two kopeks!” Lazar says, “I had a bad week.” And the beggar says, “So, you had a bad week, why should I suffer?”

Even in hard times we have continued to raise the bar for charitable giving. Last year’s Confirmation class raised over $6,000 and gave $1,500 to the Edward Williams School in Mount Vernon where many of our kids volunteer. In fact, just last night, WRT congregants convened an assembly to rescue their Amazing Afternoons after-school program, whose funding the state has cut. Our annual Confirmation fundraiser is this Sunday morning, so please come with open wallets and open hearts. Dirty cars optional but recommended.

So WRT already stands out front when it comes to social action. But Parashat Behar challenges us to go way beyond the usual way of doing it. Parashat Behar challenges the status quo. It says: examine the world as it is and turn it into the world as it ought to be.

Giving tzedakah and performing deeds of lovingkindness for people in need positions us as benefactors and them as recipients. The benefits to the recipient are real and measurable, but at the end of the day, there is no shift in the fundamental power structure. If anything, the benefactor-recipient model of Tikkun Olam highlights the power differential between one community and the next. It’s us and them instead of just us.

Enter four letters that I hope you will learn and embrace and use. C.B.C.O. They stand for Congregation-Based Community Organizing. CBCO enables synagogues to build deep relationships and address entrenched challenges through thoughtful conversations and by creating powerful coalitions across lines of race, class, and faith.

Working together, congregations identify broadly held concerns of injustice and then bring their collective power to successful action to transform their communities.

Working with local community organizing groups, Reform congregations across the country, along with their diverse partner congregations, have already achieved significant victories on issues of affordable housing, health care access and affordability, nursing care quality for both patients and employees, schooling, air quality improvement, and much more. Westchester Reform Temple is proud to be one of the lead CBCO congregations in Westchester.

Many people have said, “We know that Yonkers needs better schools. We know that Port Chester needs fair treatment for its predominantly Hispanic immigrant population. We know that Mount Vernon needs more low-income housing. Why can’t we just work on those issues?” But that defeats the purpose of CBCO, in which listening campaigns allow us to cultivate buy-in and strengthen not only the coalition but also each member congregation, one conversation at a time. Only when issues emerge from the community will we authentically serve the community.

And the issues we need to address are simply too big for WRT to tackle alone. No matter how generous we are, we can’t solve them with our tzedakah alone. No matter how determined we are, we can’t solve them with our dedication alone. No matter how loving we are, we can’t solve them with our compassion alone.

We have to join with other congregations, for one purpose: to amass the power it will take to change entrenched norms in Westchester. People in power may not care when a group of leaders from a single congregation arranges a meeting to advocate for this or that cause, no matter how much thoughtfulness and passion they bring to the table. But believe me, governments and corporations will listen when 24 congregations stand together, loudly demanding change.

The Union for Reform Judaism has identified CBCO as a priority for the Reform Movement. Rabbi Jacobs and I have been involved in a Westchester-based CBCO initiative for more than three years, and WRT has spent much of this year getting ready for this hard and holy work.

Two nights ago, in the basement social hall of Greater Centennial AME Zion Church in Mount Vernon with which we share a special partnership, 25 delegates from WRT joined with representatives of a dozen other local congregations--Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, and Muslim--to become Westchester United, formally announcing our commitment to collaborate for the greater good of Westchester County. Our collaboration, which will grow to include many more congregations, will require a significant investment of time, money, and energy from both clergy and lay leaders, an investment commensurate with our deepest hopes. The diversity in that room Wednesday night was itself inspiring. The event began with an invocation from the Quran; the proceedings were translated simultaneously into Spanish for the robust Hispanic represenation. One after another, speakers testified to the power of CBCO to transform communities. We heard about the success of the low-cost Nehemiah homes in Brooklyn and about a recent victory in confronting the Ford corporation about its contribution to pollution in New Jersey. The emotion in that room gave a tantalizing preview of this coming November’s Founding Assembly: an electrifying event that, I promise you, will make local headlines.

I’m eager to join with you and our neighbors in this effort.

Together we will fulfill the precept announced in this week’s Torah portion, accompanied by the blast of the shofar:

U’k’ratem d’ror ba-aretz, l’chol yosh’veha: Proclaim equity throughout the land, to all who dwell in it.
Kein yehi ratzon.

3 comments:

  1. Let me lift out remarks from a 2009 post on Behar:

    "The great Jewish historian Salo Baron...explained the social condition that provided the context for these Torah laws as being heavily driven by usury. Usury created social inequality and gave rise to Hebrew slavery/serfdom (i.e., from excessive indebtedness). Expropriation of the land of destitute peasants was viewed by Baron as the greatest social evil of the age. This is important to understanding the origins of these laws.

    Behar introduces two new constructs into our Biblical code: (1) the Sabbatical Year (Lev.25: 1-7), and (2) the Jubilee Year (Lev.25: 8-55). According to Columbia historian Robert Seltzer, these are unique in Near Eastern civilization. They prescribe a form of social “equality” unlike the social architectures of Sumerian, Babylonian, Assyrian, and Hittite cultures. These two constructs redefine land ownership/tenure and social structure through the institution of serfdom. Ancient Near Eastern law codes were not enforced legal codes in our modern sense. They simply demonstrated ancient rulers’ concerns for justice, fame, etc. They had 3 major elements: (1) Lex Talionis (“life for life, eye for eye…”) or a limitation on the right of vengeance, (2) protecting the defenseless, and (3) protecting the dignity and purity of the family. According to Seltzer, Torah codes included case law, fused civil and criminal law with cultic law, and added the 2 new Israelite constructs above."
    Source: http://wrttorahstudy.blogspot.com/2009/05/is-torah-democrat-or-republican.html

    Who knows whether a historian about 3 millennia from now will look back at our time and point to Congregation-Based Community Organizing as a construct which was created to tackle today's inequities, including the reportedly widening disparity between the very rich and the very poor in America (or in Israel)? Neither Sabbatical nor Jubilee Year construct "solves" the underlying problem. They serve as temporary societal resets. While socioeconomic resets don't appear too popular to me in 20th and 21st Century America, the manifestations of these inequities are real. And, one doesn't have to travel far from home to see them, as Rabbi Blake describes.

    Behar would seem a clarion call to tackle these problems. Westchester United seems a way to lever the power of limited resources across multiple faith communities with shared values.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Secular Jews, and Reform and Conservative Judaism continues to fail us. Their interests always lie in superficial events that their gentile counterparts can only be involved with. The real issues that require pride and committment to becoming real Jews, as their great-grandparents practised, rather than half-Jews or assimilationists, not unlike their non-Jewish friends, they continue to shove behind their backs.

    A Midrash tells of a reason "Behar" was chosen as the mount upon which to deliver the Jews the torah - because it was a mount. Other mountains, however, vied for the privilege, but they each had their "reasons" to stand out. Only Mount Sinai was humble and said nothing. But that humility was that which won the opportunity awarded him.

    Well, if humility is the main reason, why then did God not give the torah in a valley or at least on a plain? Because a mountain at least knows he's a mountain. Similarly, a Jew must know humility and respect for elder traditions (first try it, for then you may like it) is paramount. However, when it comes to compromising on torah, the Jew must be a mountain and know that he must stand tall, firm and stand out, to resist temptation to second-guess God's commandments.

    As torah-true Jews we can take the world above the mundane and reach that which we yearn for - a better world for all.

    Barry

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Barry,

    You are most welcome to spend a week, a month, a day, a Shabbat in our congregation before making your uninformed value judgments about who is a "torah-true" (sic) Jew.

    The Torah I cherish and teach and share with my congregation teaches love of one's fellow and the unity of the Jewish people, not the tactics of delegitimization.

    If you wish to post here again, please consider speaking to me first. I'd be happy to welcome you to our congregation in the spirit of K'lal Yisrael.

    Respectfully submitted,
    Rabbi Jonathan Blake

    ReplyDelete