Friday, December 30, 2011

Vayiggash 5772 - Judah and Judaism

VAYIGGASH 5772

You may have heard this week about eight-year-old Naama Margolese, the daughter of American Modern Orthodox Jews who made aliyah and who now live in Beit Shemesh, an increasingly haredi or ultra-Orthodox enclave in Israel.

“...Naama had become terrified of walking to her elementary school … after ultra-Orthodox men spit on her, insulted her and called her a prostitute because her modest dress did not adhere exactly to their more rigorous dress code” (The New York Times, “Israeli Girl, 8, at Center of Tension Over Religious Extremism,” December 27, 2011). Their attack has escalated into riots, where hundreds of men and boys from the haredi community have demonstrated, at times violently, to defend gender separation and their rigorous definition of modesty.

Several hundred haredi residents of Beit Shemesh have now become sufficiently emboldened to consider it appropriate to bully a schoolgirl. They call themselves Sicarii after the so-called “dagger men” who used stealth tactics to assassinate not only Roman enemies during the Judean war of the first century CE but also their own Jewish compatriots who did not share their hardline rejection of Roman authority. I call these men Jewish extremists, because that’s what they are, as much today as they were 2,000 years ago.

This virulent strain of Jewish extremism does not incubate in a vacuum, nor does it represent a totally anomalous expression of Judaism in Israel today. Spitting on a schoolgirl represents only the latest and perhaps most offensive of a string of public behaviors that illustrate what happens when a group of anti-modern extremists bump up against a burgeoning modern, socially progressive society.

As reported in this week’s New York Times, in recent weeks and months, “Orthodox male soldiers walked out of a ceremony where female soldiers were singing, adhering to what they consider to be a religious prohibition against hearing a woman’s voice; women have been challenging the seating arrangements on strictly ‘kosher’ [that is to say, gender-segregated] buses serving ultra-Orthodox neighborhoods and some inter-city routes, where female passengers are expected to sit at the back” (Ibid).

Adding fuel to the fire, there is the political reality, that Israel’s governments continue to empower extremist constituencies so that ultra-Orthodox parties end up influencing policy. In the Knesset, whose structure necessitates government by coalition, any ruling party needs to team up with a number of smaller parties representing various voting blocs in order to maintain an ever-tenuous hold on power. Should the ruling party fail to mollify its ultra-Orthodox partners, these smaller parties can and will bring down the government. The very threat of dissolution usually leads more mainstream Israeli leaders to bite their tongues, hold their noses, avert their eyes while haredi lawmakers assert their backward views and insert their draconian vision of Jewish law into the law of the land.

There is also the demographic reality. The haredi are growing well out of proportion to the rest of Israeli society and their rising voices reflect their multiplying numbers. Indeed, the only other demographic group reproducing at a similar rate in this part of the world is the Palestinians, a polarizing intensification of society’s extremes that sets up the Holy Land for aggravated conflict, even conflagration.

As the Beit Shemesh brouhaha unfolded, a congregant sent me an earnest, anguished, and probing e-mail that read, in part, “it is increasingly difficult to voice support for Israel.”

I pause here to acknowledge that there may well be among you joining us for Shabbat this evening a number who find my remarks uncomfortable. Israel, some would argue, does not need American rabbis exposing the seamiest underbelly of Israeli society. Reform Jewish communities in particular, some may argue, not inaccurately, already suffer from a debilitating malaise of Israel apathy, and what they do know about Israel is twisted and biased.
So--if you’re one of those people--just hang on. I’m not done.

The news from Beit Shemesh this week is a snapshot of the real-world Israel. To me, Israel means more than history and hopes and dreams although it also means all of those things. The real-world Israel enfolds all its dualities--triumphs and tribulations, progress and its regress. The real-world Israel embraces signature paradoxes: hi-tech and backwards, brave and bellicose, altruistic and self-serving, tolerant and repressive. The Israel of the real world and the Israel of historic hopes and dreams: one does not exist without the other.

I know that discussing the paradoxical dualities of Israel carries risks, but this week’s news is about so much more than a man spitting on a girl. It’s about a self-righteous fanatical community spitting on the soul of Judaism. Therefore we stand up and speak out.

And now a word about this week’s Torah portion.

For the past few weeks we’ve been reading the story of Joseph but this week the spotlight illuminates Judah who emerges as the real hero of the story. Joseph, now vice-regent to Pharaoh, vizier of all Egypt, has imprisoned his kid brother Benjamin as a ransom, testing his brothers who long ago mistreated Joseph, selling him into servitude, leaving him for dead, bereaving their father Jacob of his beloved son. Now Joseph has the upper hand. He wishes to find out if his brothers have become honest men, stand-up guys who have repented, changed their ways. With Benjamin in custody the brothers face an existential test: stand up for their brother and risk coming away empty-handed, or grab their rations and hightail it to Canaan without him.

At that moment, Vayiggash--a verb meaning, “he stepped up” and the title of this week’s portion. Judah stood up. He, alone among his brothers, stepped forward, stood before Joseph, stood up for his vulnerable youngest brother. “The boy cannot leave his father,” Judah insisted, “for if he leaves his father, he will die.” He alone took responsibility. He knew that if he failed to bring him home, he would “have sinned against” his “father forever.” “So now, please let your servant stay instead of the boy as a slave to my lord,” he pleaded, “and let the boy go back home with his brothers."

This is Judah’s finest moment, this moment of stepping forward and standing up, this moment of Vayiggash that gives our portion its name, and it is not only Judah’s defining moment it is a defining moment for the Jewish people. For who are we but Yehudim--a word meaning Jews but more literally, the people of Judah?

We are people of Judah, we Jews, because like Judah of the Bible we stand up for the little guy. What is the most repeated instruction in the Torah? “You shall not oppress the stranger--for you know the heart of the stranger, the vulnerable, the needy--having been slaves in the land of Egypt.” 36 times it finds expression in the Five Books of Moses. Judah’s essential moment foreshadows the Jew’s essential mission.

And this is also what we have seen this week--because in the wake of the repugnant behavior coming out of Beit Shemesh we have also seen tens of thousands of Israelis rallying in Beit Shemesh to protest ultra-Orthodox extremism. “We are fighting for the soul of the nation,” President Shimon Peres said.

A day after the protests, a leading Israeli rabbi--a haredi Jew by any standard, by the way--ruled that gender segregated buses violate Jewish law.

These voices also represent the real-world Israel, proof-positive that Israel is a thriving democracy, not a theocracy that will allow itself to be bullied into submission by its most fanatical fringes. This is an Israel worth celebrating, the Israel I love, an Israel with the soul of Judah--that is, a Jewish soul.

Meanwhile, reassuring condemnations continue to pour in from all parts of the Jewish world and from every denomination. On Wednesday, an ultra-Orthodox rabbi and contributor to the Jerusalem Post did what Judah did--he stood up and spoke out. “Attacking and spitting on a child is wrong, wrong wrong,” wrote Rabbi Issamar Ginzberg. “We are meant to be a light unto the nations, and not in the headlines of the New York Times for such unbelievably appalling behavior.”

Noting that most haredi Jews do not read the secular media (and therefore their silence should not be mistaken for approval) Ginzberg added, “I am not the spokesmen for Charedi Jewry--but I am a member of that segment of society, and proudly so. That said--this turn of events does not represent me, nor 99.9% of the people I know.”

I for one am not so sure that 99.9% of the haredi world disavow this week’s ugliness, and I would not so blithely let the collective haredi community off the hook for their silence to which Rabbi Ginzberg’s remark is a notable and refreshing exception. Nor should we excuse the obstinate unscrupulousness of the Israeli government in furthering the politics of appeasement toward the most repellent elements of Jewish religious society.

At the same time, I would caution us about impugning Israel entire. The fact of the matter is, religious fundamentalism is ugly in any guise, and America is no less a host to fundamentalists, even violent fanatics, than Israel, or for that matter, Iran. The difference is, in Israel as in America, we the people stand up in protest like Judah. In Iran the fanatics are running the show and those who dare stand up find themselves facing down the pepper spray cans, batons, and the gunsights of the Basij, Iran’s notorious paramilitary group.

The Jewish response is never to abandon Israel. To do so is to become no better than the brothers who left Joseph for dead. The Jewish response is to be like Judah, Vayiggash, who stood up, put himself in the shoes of the little guy, and spoke truth to power.

Our tradition summons us to engage with Israel all the more deeply now, standing with the vast majority of Israelis who understand that there’s more than one way to be Jewish and that the haredim do not speak for us.

We are one people--we American Jews, we Israeli Jews--with one Jewish soul and one glorious heritage that impels us to pursue justice. We call that heritage Judaism, or, more to the point, Judah-ism.

Shabbat Shalom!

8 comments:

  1. Dear Rabbi Blake,

    With all due respect, this, that you say,
    "I for one am not so sure that 99.9% of the haredi world disavow this week’s ugliness, and I would not so blithely let the collective haredi community off the hook for their silence to which Rabbi Ginzberg’s remark is a notable and refreshing exception,"
    is remarkably insensitive!

    Any normal person knows spitting on anyone, let alone a child, is repugnant. They should have immediately arrested and convicted the ugly person who did it, instead of letting the issue simmer, by letting the media chew on it, as you do here, by slandering a whole group of people collectively whom you dislike, whom you brand as being "ultra" orthodox, an ugly term used to imply a whole religious bunch of extremists (for, otherwise, there is no such thing as "overly" orthodox).

    The police, mostly leftist secular Jews, who also dislike religious Jews, jump on the opportunity to slur religious sects, by focusing on a few who protest in ugly ways, as if they, the "ultra-unreligious" have none among them who is capable of ugly behavior.

    How easy it is to sit in judgement and slander a whole group of Charedi Jews. How easy to twist the meaning of the word Charedi to mean extremist when it means "God-fearing". Please, Rabbi Blake, notice your high perch from where you instigate others in your circle to think along such divisive lines. You bear the responsibility to guide your membership wisely rather than show callousness to fellow-Jews just because their faith in God Almighty is not the fear you have in your heart.

    What that lowlife spitter did was a grand "chilul Hashem"! He desecrated the Name of Hashem. By you jumping at this opportunity to regurgitate the ugly story, you serve no other reason than to pour fuel on the fire. Yehuda got his namesake for admitting his misbehavior regarding Tamar. Don't misconstrue Yehuda's "stepping forward" to mean "stepping on" another Jew, let alone a whole segment of Jewry!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your remark -- please do not mistake my intention. I am relieved that someone from the Charedi community has spoken out. I am relieved that you corroborate the sentiment. At the same time, I stand by my claim that religious extremism thrives in communities of like-minded individuals and does not incubate in a vacuum. We have had similar disagreements before, if I recall correctly, when I suggested that Yigal Amir was not a lone fanatic but operated with the encouragement, or at the very least, the tacit approval, of an extremist religious community. It is, without a doubt, a small community -- an extreme minority, to be sure -- but a community nonetheless.

    As for "regurgitating" the story (great verb choice, by the way!) -- well, it's not like it was a private incident -- it's been all over the news and deserves a thoughtful, public response. What would have been the alternative? To remain silent and by our silence signal our approval?

    Let me state for the record, again, though, how much I appreciate you joining in the voices of condemnation. We agree, this ugly act was a chilul Hashem and an affront to the faith we cherish.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The beastly murder by a deranged homosexual of a little innocent child in Borough Park a few months ago, that shook all the Jewish communities in the world, and especially the religious ones in Brooklyn, to the core - also did not arise in a vacuum.

    No behavior arises in a vacuum (Newton's law of physics)!

    So to pick bones with the religious community, by singling out rare events, hardly gives you could footing to trample upon the religious element. Why do you never pick bones with the likes of a Soros, who funds a rabid anti-Israel agenda, or with the New York Times' Thomas Friedman, who also has the Jewish Zionist cause in his crosshairs, or, for that matter, with any anti-semitic voice, such as certainly know of, if you hadn't seen it first hand, on your trip among the "Wall St. Occupiers"?

    My point is, you should be fair, and don't grab the chance to condemn the religious environment, because, in fact, my friend, you are, wittingly or not, condemning Torah culture, which, you well know, is nothing but of the highest moral code. You and I, both your circle and mine, are Yehudi circles, we both love and honor Torah, and where perversion is a fluke, recognize it as such, rather than blindly wield an antagonistic sword.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not unique in the Charedi world for my views. Its just that most of us don't exactly comment on stories in the outside media... many haredim don't have constantly on internet access on the cell or at work all day, and even those that do are unlikely to stick their neck out and comment... But again- this is, as the commenter above pointed out, abhorrent behavior that is disgusting.

    (Having said that, the issues are much broader and clear anti-haredi Israeli media bias and a clear agenda are painting a picture that is nothing like the legitimate right of the Hareidi community to live in peace with their/our own traditions. Israel is a Jewish country after all...)

    ReplyDelete
  5. My name's Ed. I'm a psychologist. I got to say this "Tora talk" is a cheap shot at chareidi jews. Tora takes up 2% the cheap shot takes up 98%. Rabin's murder, furthermore, is as uncllear as is Kennedy's assassination. Some swear Amir did it, like some swear Oswald did it, but assassinations today at this high level are cleverly done, well hiding the conspiraters. Amir is in isolation, but not Barghouti, so you can't get info from him too. Blame it on the chareidi anyhow. I know deep down you didn't do it out of malice, rabbi, but as a kneejerk reaction because probably of the discomfort the chareidis give you for some deep seated reason.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear Rabbi Blake,

    I returned to reread your tirade against the charedi sector. Why is it, I asked myself, secular Jews, more than their religious peers, tend to adopt "liberal", or leftist, positions, especially vis-a-vis Israel. For example, taking for granted Israel's current awkward jurisdiction over "West Bank" issues, which they unquestionably support. Or, for example, disregarding the plight of Jonathan Pollard because it is a "sensitive" issue for Jews to get involved with. Or, as in THIS case, one idiot's behavior used to mudsling at the religious element, as leftists in Israel all too often are just too happy to oblige to.

    The answer, I believe, lies in your accredited sources of information.

    In American media, for example, the "Palestinians" (a name conjured up in 1967) always get more than a fair share of "concern" for their welfare, let alone their vile hatred for anything Jewish. In Israel, the religious element is ceaselessly vilified in the media. (Only 2 years ago could a "religious channel" finally materialize.)

    Religious Jews are, first and foremost, brought up with Torah and its commentaries as a backdrop to the ensuing theater of life. Secular Jews, in contrast, rely on the prevalent media.

    This, I believe, is the Achilles heel of secularists; For one simple reason, and that is, because media sources can be bought out and used to promote propaganda!

    For example, if a weed in your back lawn could cure cancer, the medical establishment, closely aligned and kept in check by "big-pharma", will never allow any respectable medical journal to publish this finding for it would severely cut into their profit from pushing patentable drugs. Were a journal to publish such an article, its revenue for ads would suddenly dry up because big-pharma's ads are what feeds and sustains this medium.

    You tell us right from your article's beginning what your creditable source of information is: the New York Times - the very publication that couldn't see fit to highlight the atrocities done to Jews in WWII; The very one that whitewashes Hamas terrorists as "fighters"; etc. You get my point.

    Similarly, when it comes to Torah thoughts, your first sources would probably be your college texts, or books originally written in English, rather than the traditional Jewish literature handed down over the millennia quoting nothing but our sages.

    Anyhow - may we all merit God's mercy and finally become a united people, drawing infinite blessings. If you read up to here, thanks for listening.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rabbi Blake, I bring you the latest news regarding another religious spitter that you will never see published in the NYT. Here is a article from todays israelnationalnews.com:

    "For the second time in less than two weeks, the Prosecution has filed sexual harassment charges in a case involving demeaning behavior by hareidi men toward women whom they believe are behaving immodestly in public. However, video from a security camera may prove that police are guilty of entrapment and fabrication of evidence.

    The latest incident took place in the hareidi neighborhood of Meah Shearim in Jerusalem. Plainclothes police pounced upon a man who allegedly spat at a woman for supposedly immodest behavior. The man is Ze'ev Frank, who is described as a member of the extremist Sikrikim group.

    Last Thursday, the charge sheet says, a woman whose identity is not known to the police walked down Harav Sonnenfeld Street in Jerusalem when Frank approached her in a threatening manner, called her a slut ("pritzeh") and spat on her. The charge sheet says that the spittle hit the woman (but does not explain how police could determine this if they do not know the woman's identity – ed.)."

    ...

    "However, security camera video shows that Frank (marked with a red circle in the Channel 2 report) did not even stop when he passed the woman (marked with blue circle) and does not show him resisting arrest in any way. It also is not clear how police who were inside the car could have heard what he told the woman."

    Ruth C.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Rabbi Blake, with all due respect, let's see you make hay of this story: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012-01-23/palestinian-woman-captive-father/52757662/1?csp=34news&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+usatoday-NewsTopStories+%28News+-+Top+Stories%29

    ReplyDelete